Scientific Investigations
Virginia Tech
Tree Growth Home
Forestry Outreach Site
 

year:1970 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1970 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1971 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1971 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1971 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1972 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1972 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1972 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1973 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1973 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1973 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1974 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1974 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1974 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.875 year:1975 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1975 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1975 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1976 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1976 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1976 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1977 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1977 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1977 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.619 year:1978 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.364 year:1978 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.364 year:1978 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.364 year:1979 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.61 year:1979 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.61 year:1979 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.61 year:1980 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.555 year:1980 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.555 year:1980 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.555 year:1981 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.203 year:1981 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.203 year:1981 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.203 year:1982 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.084 year:1982 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.084 year:1982 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.084 year:1983 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.334 year:1983 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.334 year:1983 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.334 year:1984 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.32 year:1984 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.32 year:1984 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.32 year:1985 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.307 year:1985 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.307 year:1985 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.307 year:1986 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1986 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1986 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1987 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1987 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1987 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1988 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1988 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1988 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.213 year:1989 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.28 year:1989 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.28 year:1989 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.28 year:1990 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1990 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1990 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1991 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1991 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1991 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1992 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1992 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1992 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1993 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1993 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1993 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.268 year:1994 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.362 year:1994 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.362 year:1994 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.362 year:1995 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.362 year:1995 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.362 year:1995 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.362 year:1996 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.363 year:1996 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.363 year:1996 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.363 year:1997 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.363 year:1997 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.363 year:1997 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.363 year:1998 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.109 year:1998 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.109 year:1998 
average gain in diameter (inches):1.109 year:1999 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.303 year:1999 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.303 year:1999 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.303 year:2000 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.476 year:2000 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.476 year:2000 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.476 year:2001 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.476 year:2001 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.476 year:2001 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.476 year:2002 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.508 year:2002 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.508 year:2002 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.508 year:2003 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.67 year:2003 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.67 year:2003 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.67 year:2004 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.838 year:2004 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.838 year:2004 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.838 year:2005 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2005 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2005 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2006 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2006 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2006 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2007 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6 year:2007 
average gain in diameter (inches):0.6
30 trees plotted
Annual Ecosystem Services Provided by These Trees
  1. Reduction of storm water, a service valued at $7,465.63
  2. Reduction of air pollution, a service valued at $36,926.81
  3. Sequestration of carbon dioxide, a service valued at $6,007.47
* Values quoted are based on equations developed by the US Forest Service in 2000, and may not be applicable to a particular community or household. They are only meant for demonstration purposes and more detailed models should be used for better value estimates.


* A gap in the year sequence means that no trees measured span those years.
To see all the data in this program click here for tabulated text, here for an excel spreadsheet, or here for html.