Upon successfully completing this section you will be able to:
1. Define silviculture and describe what factors must be considered when making a silvicultural decision.
2. Describe the major types of even-aged and uneven-aged regeneration methods.
3. Describe when site preparation is necessary and be able to describe the tools used in site preparation.
4. Define and describe the common intermediate treatments.
INTRODUCTION
Natural resource managers, such as foresters, manage forests using sound biological
and ecological principles. In fact, forest managers rely heavily on and apply
the silvics of tree species in making management decisions. Silvics can be defined
as the life history and general biological characteristics of trees with a particular
emphasis on environmental factors that influence these characteristics. Foresters
utilize knowledge of a trees silvical characteristics when they practice silviculture.
Silvicuture is often defined as the art and science of controlling the establishment,
composition, structure and growth of a forest. More simply put, silviculture
is applied forest ecology.
INTRODUCTION
Why would silviculture be called an art? Well first, because there are so many
unique situations in forest management. Forests are highly dynamic and complex.
Forest management situations can be so complicated that each situation often
requires a unique solution. Second, even for a specific management problem different
silviculturists may see the situation quite differently. The more experience
a silviculturist has the more information they will bring to the table. Similar
to art, we all see things a bit differently. Silvicuture is simply not an exact
science. As a result, no manual of operations exists for silviculture.
The complex forested ecosystem in the background illustrates several unique solutions.
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter you will be introduced some of the most common silvicultural
practices. The majority of what will be discussed is practices that are used
throughout the southeastern United States. You will not become an expert in
silviculture but you will be able to recognize some of the treatments when you
see them in the field, you will understand why they are being done, and you
will be able to talk intelligently with foresters.
INTRODUCTION - Landowner Objectives
Sound forest resource management begins with an understanding of the owner
objectives. What does the owner of the resource desire? This is not always an
easy thing to discern since many times owners do not know what they want. They
may only have a vague idea or they may want many different things several of
which conflict with each other. Also objectives vary widely depending on whether
the land and forest is owned by private individuals, federal agencies or industry.
Some timberlands may be managed for aesthetics and water quality.
This bottomland hardwood plantation is very productive and could rapidly produce high quality timber, but the landowner may enjoy the aesthetic qualities of large trees.
INTRODUCTION - What to Consider
Once the owner’s objectives are determined silvicultural decision making can
begin. When making decisions biological, social and economic factors must be
considered. The perfect silvicultural decision would be the best biologically,
very cheap and socially acceptable. Sometimes very cheap and biologically good
tools such as fire may not be socially acceptable. Another good example of this
is the use of herbicides. Herbicides are often the most economical way to control
weeds (unwanted vegetation), biologically they work very well but they may be
socially unacceptable. Other times the owner may want things that economically
they cannot afford. It is the job of the forester to balance these three factors
when developing plans to meet specific objectives.
Forested wetlands are areas that require special attention to balancing the three factors discussed above.
These pinelands are managed for red cockaded woodpecker habitat.
INTRODUCTION - What to Consider
Many of the practices involved in silviculture are analogous to gardening.
For example stages in a silvicultural plan may involve site preparation (tillage),
weeding, thinning and final harvesting all steps that would occur in just about
anyone’s garden. We will examine each of these practices in the order they would
occur in stand development.
In many ways, this activity can be compared to harvesting corn. These trees will be used for a diversity of products (hundreds) such as wood for homes, paper products, toothpaste, cosmetics, film and food products.
INTRODUCTION - Stands
Silvicultural prescriptions are applied at the stand level. A stand is a contiguous
group of trees of a uniform age distribution, species composition and growth
rate so that common practices can be applied to the entire area. A stand is
typically the smallest definable management unit. A pure stand is composed of
essentially one species (90 %); in contrast a mixed stand would contain several
different species.
The large mixed hardwood stand in the bottom part of this infrared aerial photograph was probably the old woodlot for Smithfield Plantation on the Virginia Tech campus (which is visible in the upper right hand corner). The overstory is primarily large, old white and black oaks.
INTRODUCTION - Stands
Stands are also classified as being either even-aged or uneven-aged. In even-aged
stands the trees are of uniform age and started together as a unit after the
previous stand was cut or a field is reforested. Uneven-aged stands are composed
of trees of various ages (at least three) and have complicated development patterns.
They could have resulted from long term natural processes where small groups
(or even single trees) die and are replaced by a new cohort or they could be
the result of past repeated entries into the stand where individuals trees or
small groups have been removed. Stands with just two age classes are not regarded
as uneven-aged but are usually termed two-aged stands. The simplest type of
stand development would be a pure even-aged stand such as a pine plantation.
The most complicated stand development (and the most complicated to manage)
is a mixed, uneven-aged stand.
INTRODUCTION - Stand Dynamics
In all stand types there are many changes with time as the trees grow. First
and most obvious the trees increase in height and diameter. Typically in a stand,
tree height is much more uniform in distribution than is diameter. Trees are
designed so that they sacrifice diameter growth before height growth. This makes
sense since without light (which is from above) the will not survive no matter
how big around they are. In fact in very dense stands, trees will be still quite
tall but they will be very spindly in diameter. A less obvious change is that
when tree size increases they begin to compete intensely for light, water and
nutrients. As a result of this competition trees begin to die and their numbers
begin to decrease. Smaller trees that slip below the canopy generally die first.
A young Virginia pine stand may have thousands of stems per acre when young,
but when they are 60 years old and 12 inches in diameter it is common for only
100 to 200 trees to remain in a stand.
The crowded 10-year-old Virginia pine stand on the left will eventually self-thin to resemble the 30-year-old stand on the right.
KINDS
OF TREATMENTS
Silvicultural treatments fall into one of two categories:
REGENERATION
METHODS
Regeneration methods can be divided into two broad classes: those that produce
even-aged stands and those that produce uneven-aged stands.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Clearcut
A clearcut can be described as the removal of an entire stand of trees in one
cutting. Reproduction is obtained either naturally or artificially. Natural
reproduction can come from either exiting seedlings, seed existing in the litter
layer, seed from neighboring uncut stands or stump sprouts from the trees cut.
A good silvicultural clearcut does not leave any residual trees from the previous
stand. Unfortunately good practices do not always occur, and many stands are
partially cut taking only the high quality trees and leaving trees of poor form
or undesirable species. This type of cutting is more properly termed ‘high-grading’
and is an abusive practice that does not fall into good silvicultural practice.
This clearcut has a good supply of seed from neighboring uncut stands, has all trees removed and is (relatively) visually appealing.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Clearcut
No other silvicutural practice has been as controversial with the public as
a clearcut. Images of barren hillsides, stumps and eroding stream-banks from
a poorly planned clearcut are hard to overlook. However a properly executed
clearcut has far less erosion than an agricultural field and quickly re-greens
in just a few short years.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Clearcut
This is a well done clearcut on the Virginia Piedmont. Notice there are very
few residual stems, little exposed mineral soil, irregular edges, and clean
enough to plant with little further site preparation. In twenty years the
area will
again look like the uncut stand in the photo.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Clearcut
Biologically clearcuts are an obvious choice for species that require large
amounts of sunlight to grow. These types of species are known as shade intolerant
species and naturally regenerate following large disturbances such as fire,
hurricanes or large insect outbreaks. Clearcuts simulate these types of disturbances.
Economically clearcutting is a very inexpensive regeneration technique. Clearly
the controversy is a great example of a social issue. The perception of the
public is that clearcuts are a bad thing, as a result the public generally disapproves
of their use.
These two harvests were very poorly done, with puddled soil, ruts, exposed mineral soil and standing residual trees. This can occur in any type of regeneration method not just clearcutting if proper care is not taken.
When done properly, clearcuts can quickly revegetate. The growth apparent in this picture is one year old, primarily from oak stump sprouts.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Seed-tree
A seed-tree removes the entire old stand in one cutting but leaves a small
number of trees usually left singly and scattered uniformly throughout to serve
as a natural seed source. The number of trees left varies but usually is between
5 to 10 per acre. The actual number left varies with how much seed is produced
and the distance seeds can travel. This method works best with light seeded
species that have seeds disseminated by the wind (e.g. pine). Additionally it
should be reserved for species that require open conditions to regenerate. Trees
left must be sufficiently strong to survive the increased wind and exposure
of the now very open site. At times seed trees may be left in strips in small
groups but this is not as common.
A loblolly pine seed tree regeneration cut.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Seed-tree
Once the new stand is established (left), the old overstory seed trees must
be removed (below).
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Shelterwood
In contrast to the clearcut and seed tree method a shelterwood does not remove
the majority of the trees in a single cut. However it does result in the formation
of a new even-aged stand. At a minimum a shelterwood involves two cuts. The
first cut is called the seed cut. In this cut about one half of the overstory
trees are removed. Trees removed are uniformly spread throughout the stand.
The remaining trees provide seeds for the new stand, and shade and shelter for
the developing new trees. Sometime after the new trees are established a removal
cut releases the new trees and removes the remaining overstory. More complicated
shelterwood cutting systems may have three or more cuts. The first preparatory
cut is designed to improve the quality or health of the remaining stand. For
example it may appear as a light thinning to build the crowns of the future
seed trees. It may also be used to speed the decomposition of the litter layer
by increasing light and thereby increasing soil surface temperatures. In this
system the preparatory cut would be followed with a heavier seed cut and one
or more removal cuts.
A shelterwood cut leaves an intact but very thin canopy, providing light shade and shelter for developing seedlings.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Shelterwood
Questions always arise about damage to the new stand when the removal cut takes
place. It is inevitable that damage will occur when large trees with wide crowns
are felled into openings filled with a dense crop of new trees. However, the
damage can be minimized with careful logging and doing it while the new growth
is still flexible enough to rebound back. At other times some damage may actually
help the new stand by thinning out overly dense stands of new growth.
REGENERATION METHODS - Even-aged Systems - Shelterwood
This type of regeneration cut is best used for species of trees that can grow
in partial shade. Eastern white pine is a good example of a species that can
be regenerated using a shelterwood. Eastern white pine is considered to be more
shade tolerant than many other pines. That means they can survive and grow in
some shade. A shelterwood provides just that sort of environment. Species that
require full sunlight to grow will not seed into the understory of a shelterwood,
as a result nearly pure stands of white pine can occur.
These white pine seedlings (right) developed in abundance following the shetlerwood cut (left).
Both of these pictures show the growth after one year in shelterwood cuts.
REGENERATION METHODS - Uneven-aged Systems - Selection
The selection method is any type of system designed to maintain uneven-aged
stands. In this method at no time is the entire stand removed. This method has
become increasingly popular to the public since it is perceived as an alternative
to clearcutting. There are two main subcategories of the selection method -
single tree selection and group selection.
This conceptual uneven-aged stand has four age classes evenly distributed over the landscape in approximately equal area.
REGENERATION METHODS - Uneven-aged Systems - Selection
In single tree selection, individual large, mature trees are removed uniformly
across the stand. In theory the holes left from these trees are large enough
to allow small groups of new seedling to develop. The basic idea is that it
mimics when one old tree dies and falls over in the forest many new young ones
begin to grow in the newly available space. With time these new trees grow and
the resulting competition between them results in one large tree again in the
same space.
This gap created when this large tulip-poplar fell over will quickly fill in with young seedlings. Single tree selection is similar but would remove the tree for forest products.
REGENERATION METHODS - Uneven-aged Systems - Selection
In group selection, small groups of uniformly spaced mature trees are removed
from the stand. Since larger openings are created, trees that are moderately
tolerant to shade such as oaks can also be regenerated.
A group slection cut in the Appalachian mountains (above) resulted in abundant white oak reproduction (right).
REGENERATION METHODS - Uneven-aged Systems - Selection
In both single tree and group selection the entire stand is never removed at
once and equal spaced numbers of different ages of trees occur. When one cohort
of trees reaches the mature age or size only those trees are removed. This results
in openings for new regeneration to occur. In another set period of time (say
15 years) a new set of trees has reached maturity and is ready to harvest. The
trees that started to grow after the previous harvest are now 15 years old.
An example stand might include 5 age classes, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 year-old
trees each occupying equal area. Every 15 years the trees that reach 75 years
old are harvested and a new set of trees begin to grow. In this example, no
more than 1/5th of the stand is ever cut at a time. This is very appealing to
a public that generally dislikes clearcutting.
REGENERATION METHODS - Uneven-aged Systems - Selection
Selection systems however require a much more extensive road system in the
stand since it is entered every 15 years instead of once every 75 years (for
our example). A more extensive inventory system is also needed to be sure the
stand is on track with the right amount of trees in each age class. Also the
system does not work well for species that are very shade intolerant (e.g. loblolly
pine).
SITE
PREPARATION
Often a large part of regeneration practices is site preparation. Site preparation
can be categorized into three broad groups ---1) the treatment of the logging
slash, 2) the treatment of mineral soil and 3) the treatment of competing vegetation.
In some regeneration methods a new forest can be established without any purposeful
site preparation, at other times site preparation is critical for the establishment
of a new stand of trees.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Logging Slash
Often following a harvest, large amounts of residual material (slash) remains
on the site. This can be composed of limbs, bark and undesirable trees felled
but left on the site. At times several cords of wood can be found on the site.
There are many reasons to dispose of this material. Simply the offensive appearance
of this slash may be reason enough to dispose of it. However, more often than
not the material is removed since it represents a future fire hazard and threat
to the new crop of trees. Slash can be so heavy that the site can not be replanted.
If machine planting is used, the site needs to very clean for the equipment
to get across the site. Even with hand planting slash can make it impossible
to move uniformly across the site and irregular and inadequate stocking may
occur. The slash also may result in heavy shade and cause mechanical injury
to the new crop.
The slash found on this site is fairly typical of a large harvest.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Logging Slash
One of the best and perhaps the most common methods for the disposal of slash
is a controlled fire. If the slash is uniformly spread across the site a broadcast
burn can be used. If it is patchy, most often the slash is first piled and then
burned. Piling of the slash is usually done by using a root rake attached to
a large bulldozer.
This bulldozer is piling slash using a root rake.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Logging Slash
When piling slash the amount of mineral soil pushed along with the debris must
be minimized. Soil lost in these piles results in an overall reduction of site
productivity similar to erosion. Slash can be simply piled or pushed into rows
and left unburned. The piles and rows however can not generally be planted and
this removes some of the land from production. Slash in piles or rows is referred
to as a windrow.
Large amounts of soil that was once spread across the site can be seen in this burned windrow.
Slash on these two sites was scattered, so it was piled and burned.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Logging Slash
During controlled burning, extreme care must also be taken so that the threat
of the fire escaping is minimized. Also burning must be timed so that the weather
conditions allow adequate smoke dispersal.
The fire below has very poor smoke dispersal and will cause problems with any communities or highways downwind. The fire on the right has excellent smoke dispersal.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Logging Slash
If done properly little or no harm occurs to the
site as a result of the burn. If the fire is too hot nearly all organic matter
can be removed resulting in serious erosion problems and unnecessary nitrogen
loss from the site. Nitrogen is found in the slash and when burned it volatizes
and is lost to the atmosphere.
The fire on this site sufficiently reduced slash and left organic matter on the site.
This fire on this site was too intense and nearly all of the organic matter was burned off.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Logging Slash
Some forest scientists argue that slash should always remain on the site. The
woody debris represents a long-term supply of organic matter and nutrients.
As the slash decomposes it slowly releases nitrogen to the developing new crop
of trees. Perhaps it is better to think about the slash as an opportunity not
an obstacle. Slash can be considered an opportunity to better manage the sites
resources and ensure long term sustainability of the sites productivity. Unless
the slash is very heavy attempts should be made to leave it on the site.
This logging slash is not much of an obstacle and should be left on the site
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of the Mineral Soil
Many times following a harvest there are limitations
with the actual mineral soil that need to be addressed in order for the site
to regenerate properly. One of the most common problems is compaction along
skid trails and at the logging deck. Disking can ameliorate this.
This skid trail is highly compacted, limiting tree growth.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of the Mineral Soil
Disk harrowing of sites is very similar to the agronomic application with the
exception that the equipment is larger and more heavily constructed. To some
extent disking will also incorporate organic matter into the mineral soil. For
very heavily compacted sites ripping or some sort of subsoiling may be needed
first to properly repair the soil physical characteristics.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of the Mineral Soil
Bedding is the mounding of mineral soil with the objective of raising the newly
planted seedlings above the winter water table. Bedding of sites is also a common
mineral soil treatment on wet coastal plain sites in the southeastern U.S. In
wet sites the water table will rise following logging and during the winter
months. Under these circumstances young seedlings may be submerged.
Wet coastal flats are commonly ditched and bedded to increase rooting volume
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of the Mineral Soil
To form beds a bedding harrow is most often used followed by an “hourglass”
shaped drum to shape the beds. Seedlings are then planted directly on top of
these beds. Bedding can also repair damage due to improper harvesting such as
rutting and compaction.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of the Mineral Soil
Fertilization is commonly done as a site preparation treatment. Nitrogen and
phosphorus are the two most commonly applied fertilizers at the time of planting.
In the case of nitrogen it is best if the fertilizer is banded close to the
seedlings. Nitrogen is quickly leached from the soil, so getting it close to
the small root systems where it can be taken up by the plant is essential. Phosphorus
is very immobile and stays in the soil for a long time as a result it can be
broadcast without worrying about it leaching from the site.
The effects of adding Phosphorus to forests soils can be dramatic. Both of these slash pine stands are 23 years old. The stand on the right was fertilized with Phosphorus at establishment.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Competing Vegetation
Competing vegetation is a major problem on most recently regenerated forest
sites. If the objective is a genetically improved pine plantation, invading
hardwood seedlings and sprouts are not desirable. In hardwood plantations competing
natural pine seedlings may be the problem. At other times herbaceous grasses
or ferns may be so intense that they overtop the newly planted trees. Site resources
(light, water, minerals) are limited and best growth will occur only if the
resources are directed to the crop trees and not to the competition. Methods
to control competing vegetation can be grouped into two broad categories—mechanical
treatments and chemical treatments (herbicides).
Weeds can have a tremendous impact on stand growth. The stand to the right of the road received no herbicide treatment.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Competing Vegetation
Mechanical treatments typically involve driving across the site with a piece
of heavy equipment pulling one or more large tools used to cut or crush the
competing vegetation. If large residual standing trees are left on the site
a shear blade is used. This sharp, heavy blade is attached to the front of a
bulldozer and can knock down very large stems. For large trees the “stinger
“ is first thrust through the tree splitting it. The shear blade can then easily
knock the tree down. Shearing is often is the first step before other site preparation
treatments can occur.
A stinger mounted on a bulldozer and its aftermath.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Competing Vegetation
For smaller stems (under 3 inches), a drum chopper can be used. This equipment
is pulled behind a bulldozer and crushes and breaks down smaller competing vegetation.
Often two drum choppers set at slightly offsetting angles are pulled in tandem.
This technique does a better job since it imparts a twisting, ripping action.
Very often sites are chopped, allowed to dry out and then broadcast burned.
Burning reduces the slash and also reduces sprouting from the remaining hardwood
stumps and broken stems.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Competing Vegetation
A V-blade is a tool that is often used in front of a bedding plow, disk, or
machine planter. A V-blade will push slash to either side and out of the way
of either the plow or planter. This is a useful tool on site with a moderate
amount of slash and where mineral soil contact is needed for a follow up treatment.
This bulldozer is pushing a V-blade and pulling a disk.
SITE PREPARATION - Treatment of Competing Vegetation
Herbicides are also used in site preparation. When done by a helicopter or
hand crews, herbicides have the advantage of not requiring a heavy bulldozer
being driven over the site. As a result no site compaction or further disturbance
occurs. At times herbicides are used in combination with a fire similar to chopping
and burning. The major disadvantage of herbicides is the public’s perception
of harmful chemicals being sprayed on a forest. However, most forestry herbicides
are very non-toxic (except, of course, to trees).
Helicopters are especially effective when herbicides need to be applied to large areas.
Herbicides can be incredibly effectivie in controlling weeds. In this photo you can clearly see which areas were treated.
Weeds can severely limit growth of planted seedlings. What did foresters do prior to herbicides and mechanical treatments?
SOURCES OF REGENERATION
In natural regeneration, the existing seed in the forest floor, seed from remaining
trees or stump sprouting supplies the new seedlings.
Many hardwoods and some conifers produce stump sprouts.
SOURCES OF REGENERATION
Foresters often rely on artificial regeneration to produce the next stand.
In artificial regeneration planted seedlings or direct seeding of a stand is
used. In direct seeding purchased seed are scattered over the entire area (much
like a new lawn) or it is applied in spots and rows. Direct seeding is not very
reliable and it is difficult to control spacing. As a result, direct seeding
is not often utilized in forestry. However in instances such as hydroseeding
of strip mines it is used.
SOURCES OF REGENERATION
It is quite common to use seedlings to artificially regenerate a stand. Following
clearcutting, genetically improved seedlings are often planted. This is especially
true for plantations. Planting of seedlings offers the best opportunity to improve
the genetic composition of the stand and it is very reliable. The seedlings
are produced from seeds collected in seed orchards. These seed orchards contain
trees that have been selected for superior traits such as straightness or disease
resistance. In the near future genetically improved seedlings may all result
from tissue culturing techniques (cloning). Planting of seedlings also allows
foresters to precisely control the spacing and density of the future stand.
SOURCES OF REGENERATION
With most conifers (e.g. loblolly pine, Douglas-fir) survival of planted seedlings
(except in the driest years) is very high (over 75%). It is a bit trickier with
the planting of hardwood seedlings and foresters have had much less success.
As a result there is far less planting of hardwood seedlings. However this may
be changing since many companies are now investing considerable resources towards
intensive management of hardwood plantations. Two hardwood species being grown
intensively are hybrid poplars and sweetgum.
These sweetgum seedlings (left) are being grown for use in an intensively managed hardwood stand such as the 5-year-old stand in Franklin, Virginia (right).
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS
Once a new stand is established there are many common practices that fall into
the broad category of intermediate operations. By definitions these procedures
are any practice that occurs between two regeneration periods. Their general
goal is to guide the stand toward the intended objective. Intermediate operations
are never intended to replace the existing stand.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Release Operations
Release Operations are some of the earliest intermediate treatments that occur
in a stand. By definition release operations occur in stands not past the sapling
stage (generally under 5.5 inches in diameter) that are intended to free the
stand from competition that is overtopping or threatening to overtop the stand.
When the trees removed (cut or killed) are the same age as the crop trees they
are called cleanings. When the trees removed are older than the crop trees the
treatment is called liberation. A third type of treatment called a weeding is
reserved for a release so intense that all vegetation except the crop is removed.
Foresters generally refer to all these treatments as release operations.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Release Operations
A common release scenario involves herbaceous weeds over-topping young seedlings.
Another very common scenario in the southeastern U.S. involves hardwood stump
sprouts (which grow very rapidly). Hardwood sprouts may need to be removed to
release a pine crop. Herbicides are most often used in these situations.
All of these stands are three years old. The top stand received no herbicide weed control, the upper right stand had one year of herbicide weed control and the lower right stand benefitted from two years of weed control.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Release Operations
In liberation cutting the older overtopping trees are only actually removed
if there is some commercial value in them. Often they are simply killed by injection
of herbicides or by girdling. Liberation cutting is not nearly as common as
cleaning. Sometimes a good stand of new trees has developed under poor quality
trees that were not previously harvested (usually because they were of no value).
It would have been better if the older trees had been cut or sheared at site
preparation.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Improvement Cuttings
Improvement cuttings occur in stands past the sapling stage. As with other
intermediate operations, the objective is not regeneration but in this case
to improve the quality and composition of the stand. Typically improvement cutting
(also known in North America as Timber Stand Improvement, TSI) is done to correct
past mismanagement. Perhaps an improvement cut is needed because a cleaning
did not occur when the stand was young. Past high grading may leave hardwood
stand composition and quality in bad shape. High grading is an abusive practice
where the stand is entered and only the best trees are removed resulting in
an overall degradation of stand quality.
Removal of trees that have been injured by weather or desease is considered stand improvement.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Improvement Cuttings
In an improvement cut trees removed are generally of poor stem quality, undesirable
species, diseased or injured. What becomes an undesirable species depends on
the owner’s objectives for the stand. When examining a stand for an improvement
cut not only should poor trees be selected but also better quality trees should
be sought out for release. In fact a critical step is to determine if enough
quality stems remain to make the stand viable for future production. At times
the stand is in such poor shape that the only alternative is to regenerate.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Improvement Cuttings
As in a liberation cut the trees are often killed and left standing in place
when doing an improvement cut. However, if there is some market for the wood
then they should be removed. In hardwoods firewood production may be justification
to remove the trees.
These young eastern white pine would respond well to a liberation from the poor quality hardwood overstory.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Thinning
Thinning is also intermediate operations that occur in stands past the sapling
stage. Their primary goal is to improve growth and quality by decreasing the
density of the stand. The distinction between thinning and improvement cutting
often is blurry. This is especially the case in mixed stands. In both instances
trees past the sapling stage are removed and both are partial cuts that reduce
stand density. However the primary goal of an improvement cut is to enhance
stem quality and stand species composition. In a thinning, maintaining the growth
of the remaining trees is the primary objective. At times both treatments are
occurring and foresters will call the operation a thinning/improvement cut.
This loblolly pine stand will need to be thinned to maintain the health and growth of the stand.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Thinning
Thinning is conducted when the product objective of a particular stand requires
a larger tree. For example, if the product is pulpwood to make paper, large
trees are not required. If the product objective is sawtimber a thinning may
be necessary. Although thinning increases individual growth, thinning does not
increase the overall growth of the stand. So if the product objective only requires
small stems than a thinning may not be necessary. Many small stems will produce
about the same total growth per acre. If the size of individual trees is important
than a thinning may be required to redirect the same total growth per acre on
to fewer larger stems.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Thinning
Thinning is often classed into two groups depending on their profitability.
Pre-commercial thinning involves the removal of trees that are too small to
be utilized. In commercial thinning all or a portion of the wood removed is
utilized.
The trees in this stand were too small to yield any profit. Consequently, this was classified as a precommercial thin.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Thinning
Thinning is also classified by the size of the trees removed. In a low thinning
(also called thinning from below) the trees removed are the smaller diameter
trees and the larger trees remain. This is a very common method of thinning
utilized in the southern pines. It also is considered the most intuitive type
of thinning. The trees being removed are exactly those that are likely to die
in the near future since they are smaller and being overtopped. High thinning
(also known as thinning from above) is almost the opposite of low thinning.
High thinning involves the removal of larger trees. The goal of high thinning
is to free up space for similar sized but better quality (e.g. straighter) stems.
High thinning is not as common as low thinning. One specific application of
high thinning would be the removal of large trees damaged by biotic (e.g. insects)
or abiotic (e.g. ice) agents. In this case a high thinning could be done which
removes these damaged trees and leaves similar sized but undamaged trees.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Thinning
A third type of thinning that is fairly common is called a row thinning (also
called a mechanical thinning). A row thinning is often used in plantations where
as a first operation every third row is removed. This releases each tree on
one side. Later in the stands development every other row is removed releasing
the remaining tree on all sides.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Thinning
Commonly in the southeast we see a combination of row and low thinning. A mechanized
harvester does all the work first cutting out a row of trees forming a corridor
for the machine to travel down. As the machine moves down the corridor it reaches
in between the rows grabbing smaller trees (low thinning), freeing up growing
space for the internal (between row) trees.
This 13-year-old loblolly pine stand was row thinned with a mechanized harvester and low thinned by reaching in between the corridors.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Other Intermediate Treatments
Nitrogen fertilization is a common intermediate stand treatment. Close to 1.5
million acres were fertilized in the southeastern U.S. in 1999. As an intermediate
treatment nitrogen is most often applied to stands when crown closure occurs.
Crown closure indicates that the crop trees are fully utilizing the site. Fertilizing the stand at this point insures that he crop, not weeds, gets the nitrogen. With the site fully occupied by the trees nitrogen is quickly taken up and little is leached out of the system.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Other Intermediate Treatments
In some specific instances sludge or effluent from various sources may be applied
to a stand. This is an efficient way to dispose of societal waste products and
the forests receive nutrients as well. Care must be taken not to over apply
these products. If rates exceed the stand’s ability to take up nutrients they
can begin to leach into ground water. However, as an alternative to depositing
this waste into landfills it is very appealing.
Sediment from drnking water treatment in Newport News, Virginia is applied to loblolly pine plantations instead of being sent to landfills.
INTERMEDIATE OPERATIONS - Other Intermediate Treatments
Fire is often utilized as an intermediate treatment. In stands of thick barked
species it can be used efficiently to remove unwanted understory species or
to reduce the litter layer in preparation of a future regeneration cut. Fire
can at times be used to thin out a very dense stand. Younger stems with thinner
bark are killed, leaving the larger stems—a very efficient low thinning.
This burn reduced the litter layer and fuel load, decreasing the chances of a catastrophic fire.
Understory burns such as this are often used to improve wildlife habitat. The fire killed the smaller understory trees allowing lush herbaceous regrowth which attracts wildlife (e.g. turkeys, deer, songbirds).
Helicopters can be very efficient tools when treating large areas. Here a helitorch ignites an area for site preparation.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary silviculture addresses a wide range of landowner objectives. These may include such diverse activities as 1) replanting mix stands to restore habitat for songbirds on former deforested agricultural land for the Audobon Society (right), 2) maintaining stream temperature, water quality, and riparian habitats (lower right), and 3) maintaining historical settings in civil war battlefield National Parks (below).